fragmented thinking

perhaps it is the way i follow what appear to be and may actually be random tangents that lead many to dismiss me, ignore me, or otherwise want to correct me... the fool becomes insecure and defensive in those moments... can a fool be a genius in disguise?... did i ask that because i want to be a genius?... am i a genius?... what is a genius?... are we backtracking to continue the thought about intelligence from the previous entry?... is that wise?... is wisdom a combination of intelligence and common sense?... what else?... am i wise?... is it wise to ask so many questions at once?... only if one is cabable of answering so many questions at once... should we assume that most people simply don't want to or shall we suggest that most people simply do not have the mental capacity, to ability to think in parallel streams of conscious and semi-conscious and subconscious planes?... is all genius the same?... does it all break down to the fundamental components, the mathematics of everything?... what is the smallest fundamental partical of everything anyway?... is it thought?... what is thought?... is thought a particle?... a wave?... energy?... matter?... does it matter?... only if you want it to, so perhaps desire is the fundamental particle... perhaps desire is the active thought, the thought with energy and motion, as opposed to the idle thought... what is an idle thought?... a thought in neutral?... a thought without desire?... what is desire?... an empty space seeking something to fill it?... a vacuum?... have we discovered anything in this paragraph?...

jackson just got home so writing pauses...